Wandrin1

Lives of Blissful Ignorance

2009-07-12T04:50:00.000-07:00

There's an often used quote by Henry David Thoreau in his book "On Walden Pond" that says 'the mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation", meaning of course that the overwhelming majority of folks realise that they have no influence on the events that affect them, and it's mostly considered in the realm of the political. "Lives of quiet desperation" would be very appropriate right now, as Congress prepares yet another audacious rape of the sex slave that is the American taxpayer. The polls, which in the past were used by politicians to gauge public sentiment so they would know how to vote...because after all, they are PUBLIC SERVANTS; are just an interesting sideshow...the Comprehensive Immigration Bill for example, had a disapproval rating in the 90% range and yet nearly got pushed through.
I would submit that since Thoreau's time things have changed. I firmly believe that the majority of the American public...the people charged with electing the politicians that we have given power over our lives....are ignorant. Not stupid in the sense that I.Q.'s are lower, although I imagine a study would show that, too..but ignorant of any pertinant information about the events that influence their lives. Talk show host Sean Hannity does a segment, usually on Thursdays, called "Man on the Street", where one of his staff goes into Penn Station with a cell phone and corrals members of the public to be interviewed on air by Hannity. The standard list of questions includes "who is the President, who is the V.P.," and then he names leading members of the House and Senate, e.g. Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi. Not only are most people unable to demonstrate that they are aware of who the Senate Majority Leader is, and who the Speaker of the House is (3rd in line for the Presidency!), but a shocking percentage of them can't even name the Vice President. If most of the public is that ill informed, that they cannot even name the people holding the highest offices in American politics, then how can they be expected to understand what is being done to our society? Here's a good article that discusses "television brain":
http://www.infowars.com/jackos-death-more-important-than-a-million-dead-iraqis/

It's an Idiocracy world right now. If you haven't seen the movie, it's basically a comedic farce that portrays a dumbed down society of ignoramuses.
Sadly, this is the keystone to the edifice that will become the prison. America is falling and can't get up. It takes a public that not only is outraged, but informed, in order to combat the perfidious encroachment on our freedom. Whether years ago an ominous group of conspirators set out to turn the minds of people to mush in order to enslave them, or whether it was an unintended consequence, the outcome is the same; we are surrounded by people so stultifyingly ignorant of what is happening to the nation that they still proudly wear the Obama T-shirts.
Many of us, and by that I mean folks who not only stay informed but understand the things they are informed of, are locked in lives of quiet desperation. I think the kettle is simmering, and the stove is turned up high, and that soon people of character will demand that "They" pay attention. All it will take is leadership, and a trigger. One more outrage that is too blatant to be overshadowed by the TV Guide. Or maybe not...after all, 6 million Jews obeyed their guards and shuffled into the gas chambers.

Let's just see

2009-07-04T04:54:00.000-07:00

Reading the news this morning, saw a news item about an interracial rape in Durham NC. Yep, the same town in which a previous interracial rape inspired a news media reaction that went way past "frenzy" into a realm for which the English language has no words. This rape, however, will no doubt garner very little attention from the MSM. Why would two similar "crimes" ( I say "crimes" because the first one, we found out much later never actually happened...remember the Duke lacrosse team case?) inspire two radically different reactions? Same crime...forcible sex. Same racial component, a white man perp raping a black person. Why would there be a difference? Same geographical area, same opportunity for the news folks to film the shot with the same town in the background while they pontificate on the horror and shock. Why would the first crime, with little evidence to prove it, garner outrage and indignation across the spectrum of politicians and legal talking heads and news anchors, while this second case will no doubt see little attention at all in spite of the overwhelming evidence that it did occur, and in fact the victim was a small child to make it even more horrific???
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=102740

I'll tell you why. The perp was a homosexual man and the victim was a black child. A young black boy living with a gay couple.

There are people who maintain that the Mainstream News Media, CNN and CBS and NBC and MSNBC and Fox are not manipulating the public, that they report the news with no regard for how it fits the profile of how they want us to think. I don't believe that, haven't believed it for years, and now they have a chance to prove it. Let's just see if this news gains any "traction". Let's just see if we are subjected to countless updates and live feeds from Durham, NC and endless commentaries. Let's just see if the president's spokesman is expected to comment on it. Let's just see if the mayor of Durham and the Durham chief of police spend any time in the lights over this. Let's just see if the news corporations prove us wrong, those of us who say they have an agenda to manipulate the minds of the American public. Let's just see.

What will it take?

2009-06-28T07:07:00.000-07:00

Thank God (or Al Gore I guess) for the Internet. Without it, we would be forced to get our news via CNN or NBC, and anyone who is at least partially awake knows that the MSM (mainstream media)selects the news they provide based on the political views of the parent corporation; overwhelmingly liberal. There's one drawback to being able to get your news relatively unfiltered and uncensored....at least for now. That drawback is that some news demands a reaction. The particular news that I am thinking of, that I read this morning,inspired me to follow up an initial query into "what the heck is Twitter??" with the act of creating a blog. Whether it ever gets read by anyone is moot...the fact is that this news p*sses me OFF. Disregard the infowars portion of the link...the original article was published in Rolling Stone magazine...not what you'd think of as a conspiracy publication:
http://www.infowars.com/goldman-sachs-engineering-every-major-market-manipulation-since-the-great-depression/
I pretty well knew that the oil prices of last summer were manipulated, and that there are forces that some folks refer to as a Plunge Protection Team that prevents un-planned market crashes. If you believe that the Fat Cats in gov't and Wall Street are content to let unruly investors control their wealth via emotion based market decisions, you are simply a fool.
So you can read the news about how our Federal Gov't has provided BILLIONS to bankers out of the tax revenue coerced out of struggling families and shrug it off and click over to a news site that tells you the details of Michael Jackson's life and death, and the latest gossip about Brad and Jennifer and Angelina, and go on with your futile day to day activities, or you can start to ask yourself if it isn't time to start making your plans for which type of person you will be when the SHTF. And it WILL hit the fan. If you think that only wild-eyed conspiracy nuts are saying there is a planned crash in the economy coming, check this out:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/schultz-paints-bleak-picture-of-future

So what's going to happen? A cursory reading of financial history tells us that any nation issuing a fiat currency (unbacked by anything other than "The Full Faith and Credit of the U.S. Gov't." in our case,) has eventually found it necessary to highly inflate that currency as a consequence of financial silliness. So let's just imagine for a moment that the stock market crashes big time, and the dollar crashes big time as a natural and commonly anticipated consequence of the debt being loaded on the backs of the American taxpayer. When food stores demand unimaginable prices for simple food staples, what will you do? Since late 2008, gun stores have reported record sales, and most standard ammunition is simply unavailable for any price. Good or bad, that means record numbers of citizens are armed, and when food becomes difficult to obtain, things not just MAY, but WILL get ugly.
What's your plan?

Does it disturb you that the people who run our Treasury and the Federal Reserve are all alumni of the corporation that is benefitting most from taxpayer funded bailouts? If the bailouts aren't the most egregious abuse of taxpayer money in our history...what do you call it? Think about it, Goldman Sachs was complicit in the manipulated oil prices of last summer (did that hurt you at all?) and right now they are receiving BILLIONS of your money even though they made BILLIONS through bilking Mom and Pop out of hard-earned dollars at the pump? And are in the process of doing it again? Not to mention they made BILLIONS off the "sub-prime mortgage" fiasco that most folks say is the trigger for the crisis that right now has devastated the families of the 9 million people thrown out of work just since the first of the year? Does that piss you off?
What's your plan?
What are you going to do...shuffle along with whatever the government response to the final crash is? Or will you unfurl your Gadsen flag and tell them "Don't Tread On Me"?

What is your plan?